Home Research Research Library The Decline in Family Medicine in-Training Examination Scores: What We Know and Why It Matters The Decline in Family Medicine in-Training Examination Scores: What We Know and Why It Matters 2023 Author(s) Newton, Warren P, Wang, Ting, and O’Neill, Thomas R Topic(s) Education & Training Keyword(s) In-Training Examination Volume Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Since the first Board examination in Ophthalmology in 1916, assessment of cognitive expertise has been foundational to Board Certification. Since then, there have been dramatic improvements in the methodology of high-stakes examinations, including psychometric techniques, the writing of questions, and differential item functioning analysis. In 1969, ABFM introduced the requirement of periodic recertification to the Board Certification Community, and subsequent research in the cognitive sciences has confirmed the importance of independent assessment of cognitive expertise across many fields. To support family medicine residencies, the ABFM conducts an in-training examination (ITE) every fall; as of 2008, the ITE uses the same psychometric scale as the certification examination, making the scores comparable to certification scores. With the aid of an easy to use, web-based app (https://rtm.theabfm.org/bayesian/predictor), residents and their residency directors can estimate their likelihood of passing the Board certification examination. In both of the past 2 years, this app has been accessed more than 200,000 times by more than 15,000 users. ABFM Research Read all 1970 Generally speaking Go to Generally speaking 1990 Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination Go to Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination 2012 Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination Go to Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination 2024 Training in Gender Affirming Care is Medically Necessary Go to Training in Gender Affirming Care is Medically Necessary
Author(s) Newton, Warren P, Wang, Ting, and O’Neill, Thomas R Topic(s) Education & Training Keyword(s) In-Training Examination Volume Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 1970 Generally speaking Go to Generally speaking 1990 Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination Go to Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination 2012 Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination Go to Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination 2024 Training in Gender Affirming Care is Medically Necessary Go to Training in Gender Affirming Care is Medically Necessary
1990 Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination Go to Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination
2012 Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination Go to Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination
2024 Training in Gender Affirming Care is Medically Necessary Go to Training in Gender Affirming Care is Medically Necessary